File Name: High-Density-Wi-Fi-Deployments.pdf
File Size: 2.03 MB
File Type: Application/pdf
Last Modified: 4 years
Status: Available
Last checked: 7 days ago!
This Document Has Been Certified by a Professional
100% customizable
Language: English
We recommend downloading this file onto your computer
High Density Wi-Fi DeploymentsHigh-density Wi-Fi is a design strategy for large deployments to provide pervasive connectivity to clients when a highnumber of clients are expected to connect to Access Points within a small space. A location can be classified as highdensity if more than 30 clients are connecting to an AP. To better support high-density wireless, Cisco Meraki accesspoints are built with a dedicated radio for RF spectrum monitoring allowing the MR to handle the high-densityenvironments. Unless additional sensors or air monitors are added, access points without this dedicated radio have touse proprietary methods for opportunistic scans to better gauge the RF environment and may result in suboptimalperformance
Large campuses with multiple floors, distributed buildings, office spaces, and large event spaces are considered highdensity due to the number of access points and devices connecting. More extreme examples of high-densityenvironments include sports stadiums, university auditoriums, casinos, event centers, and theaters
As Wi-Fi continues to become ubiquitous, there is an increasing number of devices consuming an increasing amount ofbandwidth. The increased need for pervasive connectivity can put additional strain on wireless deployments. Adapting tothese changing needs will not always require more access points to support greater client density. As the needs forwireless connectivity have changed over time, the IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN standards have changed to adapt togreater density, from the earliest 802.11a and 802.11b standards in 1999 to the most recent 802.11ac standard,introduced in 2013 and the new 802.11ax standard currently being developed
PlanningIn the recent past, the process to design a Wi-Fi network centered around a physical site survey to determine the fewestnumber of access points that would provide sufficient coverage. By evaluating survey results against a predefinedminimum acceptable signal strength, the design would be considered a success. While this methodology works well todesign for coverage, it does not take into account requirements based on the number of clients, their capabilities, andtheir applications' bandwidth needs
Understanding the requirements for the high density design is the first step and helps ensure a successful design. Thisplanning helps reduce the need for further site surveys after installation and for the need to deploy additional accesspoints over time. It is recommended to have the following details before moving onto the next steps in the designprocess: 1 • Type of applications expected on the network • Supported technologies (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) • Type of clients to be supported (Number of spatial streams, technologies, etc.) • Areas to be covered • Expected number of simultaneous devices in each area • Aesthetic requirements (if any) • Cabling constraints (if any) • Power constraints (It’s best to have PoE+ capable infrastructure to support high performance APs)Capacity PlanningOnce the above mentioned details are available, capacity planning can then be broken down into the following phases: • Estimate Aggregate Application Throughput • Estimate Device Throughput • Estimate Number of APsCalculating the number of access points necessary to meet a site's bandwidth needs is the recommended way to start adesign for any high density wireless network
Estimate Aggregate Application ThroughputUsually there is a primary application that is driving the need for connectivity. Understanding the throughputrequirements for this application and any other activities on the network will provide will provide a per-user bandwidthgoal. This required per-user bandwidth will be used to drive further design decisions. Throughput requirements for somepopular applications is as given below: Application Through Web Browsing 500 kbps (k VoIP 16 - 320 k 2 Video conferencing 1.5 Mbp Streaming - Audio 128 - 320 Streaming - Video 768 kbp Streaming - Video HD 768 kbps - 8 Streaming - 4K 8 mbps - 20 Note: In all cases, it is highly advisable to test the target application and validate its actual bandwidth requirements. It is also important to validate applications on a representative sample of the devices that are to be supported in the WLAN. Additionally, not all browsers and operating systems enjoy the same efficiencies, and an application that runs fine in 100 kilobits per second (Kbps) on a Windows laptop with Microsoft Internet Explorer or Firefox, may require more bandwidth when being viewed on a smartphone or tablet with an embedded browser and operating systemOnce the required bandwidth throughput per connection and application is known, this number can be used to determinethe aggregate bandwidth required in the WLAN coverage area. It is recommended to have an aggregate throughput fordifferent areas such as classrooms, lobby, auditorium, etc. as the requirements for these areas might be different
As an example, we will design a high-density Wi-Fi network to support HD video streaming that requires 3 Mbps ofthroughput. Based on the capacity of the auditorium, there may be up to 600 users watching the HD video stream. Theaggregate application throughput can be calculated using the below given formula: (Application Throughput) x (Number of concurrent Users) = Aggregate Application Throughput 3 Mbps x 600 users = 1800 Mbps Note that 1.8 Gbps exceeds the bandwidth offerings of almost all internet service providers. The total application bandwidth we are estimating is a theoretical demand upper bound, which will be used in subsequent calculations
3 Estimate Device ThroughputWhile Meraki APs support the latest technologies and can support maximum data rates defined as per the standards,average device throughput available often dictated by the other factors such as client capabilities, simultaneous clientsper AP, technologies to be supported, bandwidth, etc
Client capabilities have a significant impact on throughput as a client supporting only legacy rates will have lowerthroughput as compared to a client supporting newer technologies. Additionally, bands supported by the client may alsohave some impact on the throughput. Meraki APs have band steering feature that can be enabled to steer dual bandclients to 5 GHz
Note: A client supporting only 2.4 GHz might have lower throughput as compared to a dual band client since higher noise level is expected on the 2.4GHz as compared to 5 GHz and the client might negotiate lower data rate on 2.4GHz
In certain cases, having dedicated SSID for each band is also recommended to better manage client distribution acrossbands and also removes the possibility of any compatibility issues that may arise
Note: The option to have 2.4GHz only SSID is disabled by default. Please contact Meraki support to enable this feature
To assess client throughput requirements, survey client devices and determine their wireless capabilities. It is importantto identify the supported wireless bands (2.4 GHz vs 5 GHz), supported wireless standards (802.11a/b/g/n/ac), and thenumber of spatial streams each device supports. Since it isn’t always possible to find the supported data rates of a clientdevice through its documentation, the Client details page on Dashboard can be used as an easy way to determinecapabilities
4 Example Client details listingWi-Fi is based on CSMA/CA and is half-duplex. That means only one device can talk at a time while the other devicesconnected to the same AP wait to for their turn to access the channel. Hence, simultaneous client count also has animpact on AP throughput as the available spectrum is divided among all clients connected to the AP. While Meraki hasclient balancing feature to ensure clients are evenly distributed across AP in an area an expected client count per APshould be known for capacity planning
Note: In order to ensure quality of experience it is recommended to have around 25 clients per radio or 50 clients per APin high-density deployments
Starting 802.11n, channel bonding is available to increase throughput available to clients but as a result of channelbonding the number of unique available channels for APs also reduces. Due to the reduced channel availability, co-channel interference can increase for bigger deployments as channel reuse is impacted causing a negative impact onoverall throughput
Note:In a high-density environment, a channel width of 20 MHz is a common recommendation to reduce the number of access points using the same channel
Client devices don’t always support the fastest data rates. Device vendors have different implementations of the802.11ac standard. To increase battery life and reduce size, most smartphone and tablets are often designed with one(most common) or two (most new devices) Wi-Fi antennas inside. This design has led to slower speeds on mobiledevices by limiting all of these devices to a lower stream than supported by the standard. In the chart below, you cansee the maximum data rates for single stream (433 Mbps), two stream (866 Mbps), and three stream (1300 Mbps). Nodevices on the market today support 4 spatial streams or wider 160 MHz channels, but these are often advertised asoptional "Wave 2" features of the 802.11ac standard
5 Streams 20 MHz Channel Width 40 MHz Channel Width 80 MHz Channel Width 1 Stream 87 Mbps 200 Mbps 433 Mbps 2 Streams 173 Mbps 400Mbps 866 Mbps 3 Streams 289 Mbps 600 Mbps 1300 MbpsThe actual device throughput is what matters to the end user, and this differs from the data rates. Data rates representthe rate at which data packets will be carried over the medium. Packets contain a certain amount of overhead that isrequired to address and control the packets. The actual throughput is payload data without the overhead. Based on theadvertised data rate, next estimate the wireless throughput capability of the client devices. A common estimate of adevice's actual throughput is about half of the data rate as advertised by its manufacturer. As noted above, it is importantto also reduce this value to the data rate for a 20 MHz channel width. Below are the most common data rates and theestimated device throughput (half of the advertised rate). Given the multiple factors affecting performance it is a goodpractice to reduce the throughput further by 30% Throughput Protocol Data rate (Mbps) Estimated Throughput (1/2 advertised rate) w/Overhead 802.11a or 54 Mbps 27 Mbps ~19 Mbps 802.11g 1 stream 72 Mbps 36 Mbps ~25 Mbps 802.11n 2 stream 144 Mbps 72 Mbps ~50 Mbps 802.11n 3 stream 216 Mbps 108 Mbps ~76 Mbps 802.11n 6 Throughput Protocol Data rate (Mbps) Estimated Throughput (1/2 advertised rate) w/Overhead 1 stream 87 Mbps 44 Mbps ~31 Mbps 802.11ac 2 stream 173 Mbps 87 Mbps ~61 Mbps 802.11ac 3 stream 289 Mbps 144 Mbps ~101 Mbps 802.11acEstimate the Number of APsIt's important to document and review the requirements and assumptions and confirm they are reasonable. Changingone assumption will significantly impact the number of access points and the costs. If you assumed just 1.5 Mbps for HDvideo chat (as recommended by Microsoft Skype and Cisco Spark) you would need half the number of access points. Ifyou assumed 5 Mbps was required for HD video streaming (as recommended by Netflix) you would need more accesspoints. If you were designing to support 600 1 stream devices instead of 600 3 stream laptops, you would need roughly3 times the number of access points. For this example, we now have the following requirements and assumptions: • Video streaming requires 3 Mbps for HD quality video • There will be 600 concurrent users streaming video to their laptop • Every user has an Apple MacBook Pro or similar • All laptops support 802.11ac and are capable of 3 spatial streams • The network will be configured to use 20 MHz channels • Each access point can provide up to 101 Mbps of wireless throughputWe can now calculate roughly how many APs are needed to satisfy the application capacity. Round to the nearest wholenumber
7 Number of Access Points based on throughput = (Aggregate Application Throughput) / (Device Throughput) Number of Access Points based on throughput = 1800 Mbps/101Mbps = ~18 APsIn addition to the number of APs based on throughput, it is also important to calculate the number of APs based onclients count. To determine number of APs, first step is to estimate the clients per band. With newer technologies, moredevices now support dual band operation and hence using proprietary implementation noted above devices can besteered to 5 GHz
Note: A common design strategy is to do a 30/70 split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHzFor this example, we now have the following requirements and assumptions: • There will be 600 concurrent users streaming video to their laptop • Concurrent 2.4 GHz clients = 600 * 0.3 = 180 • Concurrent 5 GHz clients = 600 * 0.7 = 420We can now calculate roughly how many APs are needed to satisfy the client count. Round to the nearest wholenumber
Number of Access Points based on client count = (Concurrent 5 GHz clients) / 25 Number of Access Points based on client count = 420 / 25 = ~17 APsNow the Number of APs required can be calculated by using the higher of the two AP counts
Number of Access Points = Max (Number of Access Points based on throughput, Number of Access Points based on client count) Number of Access Points = Max (18,17) = 18 APs 8 Site Survey and DesignPerforming an active wireless site survey is a critical component of successfully deploying a high-density wirelessnetwork and helps to evaluate the RF propagation in the actual physical environment. The active site survey also givesyou the ability to actively transmit data and get data rate coverage in addition to the range
In addition to verifying the RF propagation in the actual environment, it is also recommended to have a spectrumanalysis done as part of the site survey in order to locate any potential sources of RF interference and take steps toremediate them. Site surveys and spectrum analysis are typically performed using professional grade toolkits such asEkahau Site Survey or Fluke Networks Airmagnet. Ensure a minimum of 25 dB SNR throughout the desired coveragearea. Remember to survey for adequate coverage on 5GHz channels, not just 2.4 GHz, to ensure there are no coverageholes or gaps. Depending on how big the space is and the number of access points deployed, there may be a need toselectively turn off some of the 2.4GHz radios on some of the access points to avoid excessive co-channel interferencebetween all the access points
Note: It is recommended to have complete coverage for both bands
Note: Read our guide on Conducting Site Surveys with MR Access Points for more help on conducting an RF site survey
Mounting Access PointsThe two main strategies for mounting Cisco Meraki access points are ceiling mounted and wall mounted. Each mountingsolution has advantages
9 Ceiling mounted MR, Cisco San FranciscoCeiling mounted access points are placed on a ceiling tile, T-bar, roof, or conduit extending down from the roof. Thisbrings advantages such as a clear line-of-sight to the user devices below and flexibility in where to place the accesspoint. Access points can be easily placed with even spacing in a grid and at the intersection of hallways. Thedisadvantage is the ceiling height and the height of the access point could negatively impact the coverage and capacity
• If access points have to be installed below 8 feet (~3 meters), indoor access points with integrated omni antennas or external dipole/can omni antennas are recommended
• If access points have to be installed between 8 - 25 feet (3 - 8 meters), indoor access points with external downtilt omni antennas are recommended
10 Wall mounted MRs, Cisco San FranciscoWhen ceiling heights are too high (25+ feet) or not feasible to mount access points (hard ceiling), a wall mounted designis recommended. The access points are mounted on drywall, concrete or even metal on the exterior and interior walls ofthe environment. Access points are typically deployed 10-15 feet (3-5 meters) above the floor facing away from the wall
Remember to install with the LED facing down to remain visible while standing on the floor. Designing a network withwall mounted omnidirectional APs should be done carefully and should be done only if using directional antennas is notan option
11 Pole mounted MR66 with Sector antennas, Cisco San FranciscoDirectional AntennasIf there is no mounting solution to install the access point below 26 feet (8 meters), or where ceilings are replaced by thestars and the sky (outdoors), or if directional coverage is needed it is recommend to use directional antennas. Whenselecting a directional antenna, you should compare the horizontal/vertical beam-width and gain of the antenna
When using directional antennas on a ceiling mounted access point, direct the antenna pointing straight down. Whenusing directional antennas on a wall mounted access point, tilt the antenna at an angle to the ground. Further tilting awall mounted antenna to pointing straight down will limit its range
Cisco Meraki offers 6 types of indoor-rated external antennas (available for MR42E and MR53E): 12
Estimate Device Throughput While Meraki APs support the latest technologies and can support maximum data rates defined as per the standards, average device throughput available often …
Cisco Meraki access points feature a third radio dedicated to continuously and automatically monitoring the surrounding RF environment to maximize Wi-Fi performance even in the highest density deployment.
Up to 1.9 Gbps. Cisco Meraki APs provide high capacity wireless in dense, demanding environments. Cisco Meraki APs are custom-designed for cloud management and are built with enhanced CPU and memory capabilities to enable rich services, including Layer 7 application traffic shaping at the network edge.
Cisco Meraki includes powerful, automated RF optimization system delivers high-performance wireless in high density environments and under challenging interference conditions.
Client balancing is recommended for high density applications as the feature tries to balance the number of users across APs. The feature is available starting MR25 firmware version and is enabled by default. Cisco Meraki MR access points support a wide array of fast roaming technologies.